Cruise Reports
![]()
|
Gail
Christeson We left Balboa, Panama, on schedule at 10 a.m. on Sunday, July 6. We've now been steaming for 1.5 days and have had great weather with calm seas. There are 42 people on board the R/V Maurice Ewing. There are 19 members of the crew: captain, 1st mate, 2nd mate, 3rd mate, chief engineer, 1st engineer, 2nd engineer, 3rd engineer, boatswain, 2 A/Bs (able-bodied seaman), 1 O/S (ordinary seaman), 3 oilers, steward, cook, and utility person. The science party outnumbers the crew, and has 22 members: 11 from UTIG (chief scientist, co-chief scientist, 2 OBS people, seismic processor, 6 watchstanders), 3 marine mammal observers, science officer, systems manager, electronics tech, and 5 gunners. We expect to arrive on station to begin deploying OBSs sometime Friday morning or early afternoon. Until then we are passing the time with a safety briefing, a fire and boat drill, daily science meetings, and endless movies to watch. Gail
Christeson Gail
Christeson Gail
Christeson A
good seismic cruise is a boring cruise, and fortunately the past day
has been boring. The streamer has been riding at a good depth since
we fixed the bird and took off some weights, and there have been no
gun problems. We've missed a few shots when one of the computer systems
crashes, but otherwise everything is running smoothly and we are on
schedule. Gail
Christeson Our plywood ping-pong table has now been painted green, and a doubles tournament is being organized (random draw). During our transit home we'll have a singles tournament. This provides a good diversion when we are not on watch, although we do seem to lose ping-pong balls with some regularity behind the OBS equipment boxes that are in the same lab. We
are more than halfway through our seismic acquisition, and so far
we are right on schedule to accomplish our entire planned program
by Sunday evening when we need to start bringing in the streamer and
start recovering our OBSs. On
Friday we had to bring in the streamer one final time as a malfunction
caused us to stop recording data. Fortunately the problem was near
the front of the streamer, so after about 2 hours we had the streamer
back in the water with the problem fixed. The solution was to replace
a bad 'can' - a device that converts an analog signal to a digital
signal. It is now Sunday evening and we are nearing the end of our
seismic survey. At around 10:30 tonight we will finish our last profile,
bring in the streamer, and then retrieve our OBSs from the seafloor.
We will use 2 methods to release the OBSs. The first method is an
acoustic release, where we send a signal from the ship as we near
the OBS and the OBS releases from the seafloor. We will use this to
get about half the OBSs. The second method is a timed release. All
of the OBSs have a timed release programmed into them, and since we
know exactly when the OBSs are set to leave the seafloor we can put
together a schedule to get the ship to the OBS location at the correct
time. It should take us about 31 hours to get all 16 OBSs - about
2 hours per instrument. On Sunday evening we finished our last MCS profile. Bringing in the gun array took about 45 minutes, and then we began bringing in the 6 km streamer. This didn't finish until 6:30 a.m.! We are now picking up OBSs, and will continue until tomorrow afternoon. As soon as we get the last OBS on board we'll head back to Panama. Gail
Christeson We've finished up our work at Hess Deep and are now heading back to Panama. Unfortunately 3 of our last 4 OBSs were not recovered, but before that we were 12 for 12. We are now spending our time doing additional processing on the MCS data, and some initial work on the OBS data. So far I've been able to map the seismic layer 2A/2B boundary on 7 profiles located within 4-5 km of the scarp edge. There have been 4 submersible dives in the region mapped by these 7 profiles, and at these locations the seismic layer 2A/2B boundary corresponds well with the observed depth of the extrusive - dike boundary. Since the primary goal of our project was to see if there is a correlation between seismic boundaries and geologic boundaries, it is great to already see that such a correlation does appear to exist! UT
Institute for Geophysics |