To
more links on Caribbean researchC. DeMets (Geology & Geophysics, U.W.-Madison., 1215 W Dayton St, Madison, WI
53706; chuck@geology.wisc.edu); T. Dixon and F. Farina (RSMAS, Univ. of Miami, Miami, FL
33149-1098); E. Calais (CNRS, 250 Rue Albert Einstein, 06560 Valbonne, France); P. Jansma
(Geology Dept, U.P.R.-Mayaguez, Mayaguez, PR 00708); P. Mann (Institute for Geophysics,
U.T.-Austin, 8701 Mopac Blvd, Austin, TX 78759)
Due to the lack of unambiguous conventional geologic observations that record the
displacement of the Caribbean plate relative to the neighboring North American, South
American, and Cocos plates, the Caribbean plate remains one of the only major plates whose
present-day kinematics are controversial. As we have previously reported, GPS observations
in 1986 and 1994 within a geodetic network that spans the Caribbean-North America plate
boundary in the vicinity of Cuba, Hispaniola, and Puerto Rico suggested that the Caribbean
plate moves at a rate nearly twice that predicted by the NUVEL-1A model, but in a
direction consistent with that predicted by NUVEL-1A. Repeat observations in late 1995 now
confirm this result. Additionally, velocities transecting the plate boundary at the
longitude of Hispaniola suggest that Caribbean-North America motion is focused primarily
along the Septentrional fault, which has not experienced a major ground-rupturing
earthquake for more than 700 years, with lesser slip occurring along the
Enriquillo-Plantain Garden faults and possibly, a submarine fault north of Hispaniola.
Further details regarding the slip partitioning will require additional observations along
a dense north-south transect of Hispaniola. We will discuss several hypotheses for the
significant discrepancy between the GPS-derived velocities and those predicted by
NUVEL-1A, including (1) internal deformation of the Caribbean "plate" that is
not accounted for in the NUVEL-1A model and (2) a significant error in the global plate
circuit outside the Caribbean region.