corners
Jackson School of GeosciencesUTIG logo
Institute for Geophysics
Department of Geological SciencesBureau of Economic GeologyInstitute for Geophysics
Untitled Document
Transantarctic Mountains
Contrasting Architecture and Dynamics of the
Transantarctic Mountains

TAM Home :: Pensacola-Pole Transect :: Migration

Migrating radar records

Radar sounding records are typically interpreted without substantial data processing. In this study, seismic migration processing methods were applied to differentiated radar sounding records experimentally to correct for angular relationships of the bed surface (Fig. 11). Because radar records image only the air/ice, ice/bed and air/bed interfaces without substantial bed penetration, only morphological data may be extracted about the bed surface. Therefore, for detailed structural analysis, it is imperative that ‘true’ angular relationships are preserved. Seismic migration provided a method of processing that more accurately displays planar dips.

A 2-layer, 2-D finite difference migration was applied to all radar records to account for latitudinally varying ice and air thickness along the length of a transect. All migration was done using Paradigm Geophysical’s Focus version 4.3 seismic processing software. Median trace spacings for each transect were used. A 2-layer velocity model was derived using ice surface picks and nominal air/ice velocities. 80% Vr.m.s. velocities were calculated at each point as per the Dix (1959) equation:

 

Vr.m.s. = [((t1v12) + (t2v22))/(t1+t2)] 1/2

 

Where v1 is the velocity of radar waves in air (300 m/µs) and v2 is the velocity of radar waves in ice (169 m/µs), t1 is the distance to the air/ice surface interface in two-way time and t2 corresponds to the two-way time between the ice surface and the end of the radar record and includes the ice/bed surface interface. More points were picked when there was more topographic variation.

Figure 
          (a) shows the 'original' radar data (unmigrated). The bedrock surface 
          is difficult to interpret in detail because the echo is made up of many 
          diffraction hyperbolae. Figure (b) shows the same radar data migrated. 
          The radar echo is much sharper because the migration process has colla[sed 
          the difraction hyperbolae to one point. The bedrock and ice surfaces 
          are then picked (c) and interpreted using known geology when possible 
          (d)
Figure (a) shows the 'original' radar data (unmigrated). The bedrock surface is difficult to interpret in detail because the echo is made up of many diffraction hyperbolae. Figure (b) shows the same radar data migrated. The radar echo is much sharper because the migration process has colla[sed the difraction hyperbolae to one point. The bedrock and ice surfaces are then picked (c) and interpreted using known geology when possible (d).


Migrated files were then imported into Schlumberger Geoquest’s IESX version 3.7 software for interpretation. The ice and bed surfaces were picked using the following criterion:

1.       The strongest echo was picked with the assumption that it was the echo received from directly below the aircraft.

2.       When a mountainous looking bed surface was superimposed upon a horizontal bed surface echo, the horizontal surface was picked due to the likelihood that the more mountainous echo came from off to the side of the aircraft.

3.       When two equivalent (in strength) bed echoes were superimposed, the higher of the two was chosen because the lower echo probably came from the side.

4.       The ice surface echo was chosen as the initial strongest ‘horizontal’ record.

5.       Geologic maps were used where available to supplement and cross check bed surface picking.

Migration improved the radar record by correcting for angular relationships that became cluttered from diffraction hyperbolae that result from imaging one point reflector at several aircraft locations. Point reflectors are displayed in the up dip direction and migration replaces point reflectors to their correct position below the aircraft as well as correcting for vertical reflection time.

 

 

About UTIG Mission Statement Director's Letter Strategic Plan Directions to UTIG History Academic Partners
Overview TXESS Revolution IPY Learning Activites Wired Antarctica GK-12 Program Adopt-A-School Teachers in the Field Earthquake Hazards
Support UTIG Industry Sponsors Sponsored Projects
News Main Seminars In The News Spotlights News Releases Contacts Experts Guide Field Work Calendar JSG Meetings
Directory Research Staff Technical Staff Administrative Staff Students Alumni Standing Committees Job Opportunities
Research Main Active Projects Archived Projects Plate Models Neotectonics Plate Boundary Processes Earthquake Seismology Continental Margins Climate Polar Studies Ice and Ice-covered Lithosphere Sea-Level Fluctuations Gas Hydrate Studies Natural Resource Exploration Quantitive Geophysics Planetary Geophysics
Overview Technical Support Seismic Data Center Library OBS Facilities TexSeis Earthquake Center Hockley Seismic Station Contribution Search
Overview