corners
Jackson School of GeosciencesUTIG logo
Institute for Geophysics
Department of Geological SciencesBureau of Economic GeologyInstitute for Geophysics
ANALYSIS OF UTIG PUBLICATIONS AND CITATIONS

Analysis of UTIG Publications and Citations


III. Classification of Contributions


III. Classification of Contributions

III.A. Categories Based on Type of Publication

Obviously, not all scientific contributions are of equal significance or represent equal levels of effort; some are full-length books which may influence generations of scientists, while others are comments or book reviews of less than a page in length and of transient interest to the scientific community. Thus, to make statistical counts of contributions more meaningful, we assigned each contribution to a category based on the nature of the journal, etc., in which it was published.

We define four publication categories that covered the vast majority of contributions; these categories are: publications in 'mainstream' journals, publications in 'archival' journals or volumes, publications in 'proceedings' volumes, and publications in 'other' journals.

To avoid some obvious oversimplifications which arise from a strict use of the above three categories, we defined three additional special categories:

Our philosophy in creating these categories was to make it possible to count contributions and attribute citations in a way that was comprehensive but fairÐmaintaining the list as a complete and comprehensive record of research activity while avoiding the possible criticism that counting statistics were overwhelmed by obscure or less significant publications. On the other hand, to keep things simple we chose not to create even more separate categories such as 'full-length books', 'extended abstracts', 'maps and cross sections', 'chapters in mainstream collections', 'well-written articles', 'articles by turkeys', etc.

There are, of course, some quite reasonable limitations in the categories we have chosen. For example, a few of the so-called 'archival' publications would undoubtedly be considered as 'mainstream' in fields outside of the earth sciences; examples in the CL include articles in American Naturalist, Icarus, Journal of Theoretical Biology and Moon. And, inevitably some of the archival earth science publications are full-length books or peer-reviewed, full-length journal articles that are more significant that other contributions which appear in mainstream journals. Finally, we have been unable to inspect many contributions personally, and in a few cases it is unclear to what category they belong. Nevertheless, the present system is, for the most part, objective, and we believe that the majority of contributions are classified properly.

III.B. Categories Based on Characteristics of Authors

Who are the authors contributing to the CL? To make the statistical analysis more meaningful we have assigned each contribution a category based on the employment status of its author or authors. There are five author categories:

Note that this author categorization system is specifically designed for obtaining information about UTIG staff and students, and is not complex enough to provide parallel information about staff and students at the Department of Geological Sciences. Thus

The reason for not designing a more parallel and comprehensive system is that there has been no uniform practice concerning the CL and publications by DGS faculty who hold zero-time or summer-funded UTIG appointments. Thus, while Clark Wilson and his students have contributed 24 F1st papers to the CL, the entire list includes only 6 other F1st contributions. This suggests that most other DGS faculty with zero-time UTIG appointments have not included their publications in the CL; this means that any statistical analysis of faculty articles currently on the CL doesn't provide an inadequate estimate of the extent of collaboration between UTIG staff and DGS faculty.

However, in case there is ever a desire to construct a more complete or merged UTIG-DGS contribution list, we have designed the Fortran programs (Appendix IV) so that it would be possible to implement a revised author-categorization scheme automatically. In particular, one program input file is an 'author history' data file which categorizes individuals as faculty, students, or UTIG employees, and gives their dates of employment at UT; it would thus be straightforward to construct any number of different algorithms which act on author character strings and thus reclassify author category.


UTIG Home

UTIG Library

Table of Contents

Introduction

Classifying the Contributions

The Science Citation Index

Results

Conclusions and References


About UTIG Mission Statement Director's Letter Strategic Plan Directions to UTIG History Academic Partners
Overview TXESS Revolution IPY Learning Activites Wired Antarctica GK-12 Program Adopt-A-School Teachers in the Field Earthquake Hazards
Support UTIG Industry Sponsors Sponsored Projects
News Main Seminars In The News Spotlights News Releases Contacts Experts Guide Field Work Calendar JSG Meetings
Directory Research Staff Technical Staff Administrative Staff Students Alumni Standing Committees Job Opportunities
Research Main Active Projects Archived Projects Plate Models Neotectonics Plate Boundary Processes Earthquake Seismology Continental Margins Climate Polar Studies Ice and Ice-covered Lithosphere Sea-Level Fluctuations Gas Hydrate Studies Natural Resource Exploration Quantitive Geophysics Planetary Geophysics
Overview Technical Support Seismic Data Center Library OBS Facilities TexSeis Earthquake Center Hockley Seismic Station Contribution Search